Will the government be necessary?
By: Luis Beltran Guerra G. - 19/03/2023
Share:
It is a truth, one of those that does not require proof, that "efficient governments" are needed and that people are obviously much more satisfied when fate has placed them in countries administered by them.
In order to qualify them, we resort to the methodology consisting of analyzing "the elements that are positioned, one with respect to the other", in order to evaluate them". For example, Germany, Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom and Switzerland are included among the 5 countries with the best conditions for business models based on new technologies. For Plato, who must have heard it from Socrates, "the ideal government" is conditioned by the intellectual capacity that the aristocracy, timocracy and oligarchy suppose". And a little further here we also listen to Thomas Jefferson, the one capable of ensuring the rights of the people more effectively. We could affirm that the definition has not lost its validity. Rather, it continues as a criterion to distinguish it from the bad guys. Task, the result of which is not without perplexing.
For The Economist magazine, the measurement, in order to qualify governments as democratic, must take into account "the electoral process and pluralism, functioning, political participation, democratic political culture and civil liberties", considering that 36.9% of the world's population lives under an authoritarian regime and 45 under democracies, very few developed, numerically speaking (Norway, New Zealand, Finland, Sweden, Iceland and Denmark). The categorization derived from the study? 1. Full democracies, 2. Defective, 3. Hybrid regimes and 4. Authoritarian. The characteristics of the latter? political pluralism, non-existent or limited, few institutions and little substance, elections, if there are any, not free and civil liberties violated, repression and generalized censorship.
“The good government” also wanders between that duality of “right and left” that has divided the world, despite the fact that for some it has lost its former validity. It does not seem to Francis Fukuyama that of the bestseller "The end of history", in whose pages he conceived a humanity that had discovered that kind of "panacea" of the conjunction of "liberal democracy with the market economy". Today the academic is concerned that "advance gives" the ultra-right, nationalism and populisms ", a problem that he analyzes in his text" Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment ". We copied from the Synopsis “The demand for recognition of one's own identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is happening today in world politics. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is founded has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity or gender, resulting in anti-immigrant populism, the resurgence of politicized Islam, the Campus “Identity Liberalism” and the Rise of White Nationalism”. The preface reads "This book would not have been written if Donald J. Trump had not been elected president in November 2016." It is up to the reader to assimilate the analysis, quite interesting of this outstanding PHD from Harvard. It is not, as they say, of our harvest, but of the intellect of the outstanding scientist. that have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the resurgence of politicized Islam, the “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the rise of white nationalism.” The preface reads "This book would not have been written if Donald J. Trump had not been elected president in November 2016." It is up to the reader to assimilate the analysis, quite interesting of this outstanding PHD from Harvard. It is not, as they say, of our harvest, but of the intellect of the outstanding scientist. that have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the resurgence of politicized Islam, the “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the rise of white nationalism.” The preface reads "This book would not have been written if Donald J. Trump had not been elected president in November 2016." It is up to the reader to assimilate the analysis, quite interesting of this outstanding PHD from Harvard. It is not, as they say, of our harvest, but of the intellect of the outstanding scientist. It is up to the reader to assimilate the analysis, quite interesting of this outstanding PHD from Harvard. It is not, as they say, of our harvest, but of the intellect of the outstanding scientist. It is up to the reader to assimilate the analysis, quite interesting of this outstanding PHD from Harvard. It is not, as they say, of our harvest, but of the intellect of the outstanding scientist.
It is true, as it is read, that democracy must be conceived as "linked to freedom", but it is also claimed that "prosperity and a better and more dignified life". This kind of ambivalence has accompanied "the formula (democracy)" throughout history. An unquestionable truth, taken advantage of by regimes that are hardly and almost not democratic as far as their source is concerned, but respected, both internally and externally, for their indisputable advances as world powers. For many, the case of the China of Confucius and of which Hi Jinping is president today, the son of a comrade in arms of Mao Zedong and a revolutionary who fought against the Japanese. He left, how to read, through the front door as secretary of the PCCH to be re-elected President of the country. A 69-year-old helmsman.
It is not easy to predict that Mr. Hi is applying "the Confucian teaching", which postulates "the duty to be clear about the place of each person in society and the responsibility of the ruler towards his people", but, perhaps, it is the most likely. What the Chinese President seems to be warning about is that to govern "you have to be well on your feet", perhaps the reason for starting his third term "surrounded by faithful squires who have accompanied him throughout his career" and who have accompanied him since Jinping ruled in the provinces of Fujian, Zhejiang and Shanghai (El Mundo, Spain). Sources call the group “the magnificent seven”: 1. Li Qiang, Premier, 2. Ding Xuexiang, Vice Premier, 3. Zhao Leji, Chairman of the National People's Congress, 4. Li Xi, Head of the Central Commission for Disciplinary Inspection, 5. Wang Huning, President of the Political Consultative Conference, 6. Cai Qi, Head of the Propaganda Department and 7. Han Zheng, Vice President, whom the journalist describes as "old squire of XI in Shanghai." One question, among others, will China, with such a small cabinet, remain close to the US, in the context of discussions about which is the world's leading power? A Latin American, without intending to hurt sensibilities, would affirm that there are very few people for the encomienda. in the context of discussions about which is the first power in the world? A Latin American, without intending to hurt sensibilities, would affirm that there are very few people for the encomienda. in the context of discussions about which is the first power in the world? A Latin American, without intending to hurt sensibilities, would affirm that there are very few people for the encomienda.
What has been exposed leads to the raison d'être of the title of this essay "The government, will it be the necessary one?". We think that the reader, if he had any, assumes, perhaps, that this writer would conclude that in the face of so many ramblings of "traditional democracy", there are a few points in favor of the HI regime.
And much more in such dark times, like those that are lived. Typified by lousy governments, unable to get out of them. The muddy crowds on how to achieve it.
Comments welcome
«The opinions published herein are the sole responsibility of its author».